210 college students were asked in a survey if they preferred Windows or Mac brand computers. 85 students claimed that they preferred Mac to Windows brand computers. One fourth as many of the students who preferred Windows to Mac had no preference. How many of the students in the survey preferred Windows to Mac brand computers? A. 25 B. 50 C. 75 D. 100 E. 125
(D) The survey divides these college students into 3 groups, that do NOT overlap: preferred Mac to Windows, preferred Windows to Mac, had no preference. So the sum of numbers of students in these groups equals 210. Let’s denote the number of students who had no preference by x. Then the number of students who preferred Windows to Mac was 4x. 85 + 4x + x = 210 5x = 125 x = 25 The number of the students in the survey who preferred Windows to Mac brand computers was 4x = 4 × 25 = 100. The correct answer is D. ---------- It is confusing when it says the students had no prefernce. It is not sure if they liked netiher brand, or liked both.
It is confusing when it says the students had no preference. It is not sure if they liked neither brand, or liked both.
This question is about preference. They were asked which one they preferred. Like in a comparison, one of the choices could be more preferable (">" or "<"). Also, a student could have no preference ("="). In other words, it did not matter whether a student liked them both equally, or didn't like them both equally - he would still have no preference.
When a student found one of them more preferable, he still could be liking (or not liking) them both, but one of them more, than the other.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
GMAT(TM) and GMAT CAT (TM) are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council(TM). The Graduate Management Admission Council(TM) does not endorse, nor is affiliated in any way with the owner or any content of this site.