Post subject: GMAT Integrated Reasoning: Table Analysis
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:32 am
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:48 am Posts: 477
The Democratic Party is trying to analyze and evaluate the results of the various elections. For each of the following statements select “Would Explain” if it would, if true, explain some of the information in the table. Otherwise select “Would Not Explain.
A. There were three major candidates running in the Governor’s race, while statewide races featured only Democratic and Republican candidates.
B. The Democratic candidate for President was a business executive.
C. There was no Republican candidate for the mayoral race in Washington. ---------- Hi there. Could someone please outline this question. Literally don't get any of it. Thanks a lot.
Post subject: Re: GMAT Integrated Reasoning: Table Analysis
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:05 am
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:11 pm Posts: 453
We have the table with percentages (the results of democratic candidates in various cities and on different levels). The task is to determine whether the given statements can tell us why the numbers are such and not the other.
For example, if statement A is a fact, it explains why the percentages in "Governor" column are lower than percentages in Presidential and US Congress columns. If there are two major candidates in an election, most of the votes will split between them, let's say 60% and 35%, or 55% and 42%, etc. However, if there are three major candidates, most of the votes will split between the three, for example 30%, 30%, 35%. Thus even the winner in a three-split can easily have lower percentage than a looser in a two-split. We see that in these elections people like democratic party, so the lower numbers in the Governor column can be reasonably explained by statement A.
Note, that there can be other reasonable explanations. For example voters may simply not like the governor candidate. However we do not require statement A to be the only possible explanation.
Statement B is simply irrelevant on its own.
Statement C, on its own, works against the numbers in the table. It would explain, if the numbers were different, but not the given percentages.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
GMAT(TM) and GMAT CAT (TM) are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council(TM). The Graduate Management Admission Council(TM) does not endorse, nor is affiliated in any way with the owner or any content of this site.