Let a be a positive integer. If n is divisible by 2ª and n is also divisible by 3²ª, then it is possible that n is NOT divisible by

A. 6 B. 3 × 2ª C. 2 × 3²ª D. 6ª E. 6²ª

(E) If n is divisible by 2ᵃ and 3²ᵃ then it must be divisible by least common multiple of 2ᵃ and 3²ᵃ which equals 2ᵃ × 3²ᵃ.

Therefore the smallest possible value number n can take is 2ᵃ × 3²ᵃ which is less than answer choice (E), 6²ᵃ = 2²ᵃ × 3²ᵃ. A larger number can not be a divisor of a smaller one so 2ᵃ × 3²ᵃ is NOT divisible by 6²ᵃ. It means, that 6²ᵃ is not necessarily a divisor of n.

The right answer is choice (E). ---------

Why do we conclude from "that this number is smaller than choice (E)," that choice (E) is the right one?

We make a conclusion that choice (E) is the right one because we've shown that if n = 2ª × 3²ª (it fully satisfies the question statement) then it is not divisible by 6²ª simply because 6²ª is greater.

And furthermore I'd like to go over this question once again in details. The question statement tells us that n is divisible by 2ª and 3²ª, where a is some positive integer. Therefore we can represent n as: n = 2ª × 3²ª × d, where d is some positive integer.

Note, that we consider n to be a positive integer for simplicity since divisibility of n or -n is the same.

We write the above mentioned formula for n because 2ª and 3²ª are relatively prime. If they where, for example, 10 and 15 (instead of 2ª and 3²ª) then n would equal 2 × 3 × 5 × d because 2 × 3 × 5 is the least common multiple of 10 and 15 while the least common multiple of 2ª and 3²ª is 2ª × 3²ª.

Let's return to our formula and consider all the answer choices: n = 2ª × 3²ª × d

A. Is n divisible by 6? Yes, because it is clearly divisible by 2 and 3.

B. Is n divisible by 3 × 2ª Yes, because it is clearly divisible by 3 and 2ª is a multiplier in formula for n.

C. Is n divisible by 2 × 3²ª Yes, because it is clearly divisible by 2 and 3²ª is a multiplier in formula for n.

D. Is n divisible by 6ª Yes, because we can rewrite the formula for n: n = 2ª × 3ª × 3ª × d and 6ª = (2 × 3)ª = 2ª × 3ª So 2ª and 3ª are the multipliers in formula for n.

E. Is n divisible by 6²ª It can be or it can be not. Let us divide n by 6²ª: n / 6²ª = (2ª × 3ª × 3ª × d) / (2ª × 2ª × 3ª × 3ª) = d / 3ª So n / 6²ª = d / 3ª

We clearly see that if d is divisible by 3ª then n is divisible by 6²ª. But if , let's say, d = 1 then n is not.

Therefore nMUST BE divisible by the choices (A) – (D) and NOT NECESSARILY by choice (E).

I'm not seeing this: - 6 to the 2a is different than 6 to the a how? - both 6's are multiples of each of the primes provided and how is C not the same? (2 × 3 to the 2a?)

Because, if n is divisible by 2ª and n is also divisible by 3²ª, then n MUST be divisible by 3 × 2ª (B). While the question asks us to choose a value that might NOT be a divisor of n.

In other words, we don't know what the real value of n is. It can be any value that satisfies "n is divisible by 2ª and n is also divisible by 3²ª". Choices A, B, C, D are divisors of any such value of n. While there is at least one possible value of n (e.g. 2ª × 3²ª) for which E, 6²ª, is NOT a divisor.

Not sure I am following the logic here due to the fact that Answer Choice E seems to be larger than Answer Choice D? I could be completely missing the point here, and most likely the case, but if you have some additional explanation that would be really helpful. Would picking numbers at all make sense here? Also, is this a 700-800 level question or more in the range of 600-700? Please let me know when you have an opportunity, thank you very much.

Not sure I am following the logic here due to the fact that Answer Choice E seems to be larger than Answer Choice D? I could be completely missing the point here, and most likely the case, but if you have some additional explanation that would be really helpful. Would picking numbers at all make sense here? Also, is this a 700-800 level question or more in the range of 600-700?

This is more a 600-700 question, though it might look harder. But the concept is very simple:

1. The smallest possible number, which is divisible by both 2ª and 3²ª is 2ª × 3²ª . 2. Choice E, 6²ª , is greater than 2ª × 3²ª , so it is definitely NOT a divisor of 2ª × 3²ª.

We have shown that at least one possible value of n (2ª × 3²ª) is NOT divisible by E. So E might NOT be a divisor of n.

The question tests the following abilities: - dealing with powers - knowing what factorization is and how it is connected to divisibility.

ANOTHER APPROACH. Take a look at the answer choices. Exactly one of them must be the correct answer.

Choice E is divisible by any other answer choice. So if E is a divisor of n, then all the other answer choices are divisors as well.

Thus E cannot be the divisor of all possible values of n, because in this case all the answer choices would be the divisors and we would have NO correct answer.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum

GMAT(TM) and GMAT CAT (TM) are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council(TM). The Graduate Management Admission Council(TM) does not endorse, nor is affiliated in any way with the owner or any content of this site.